latest   8 entries tagged 'legal': 1-5 6-8
permalink 2006-04-15  legal
edit  

It was Easter Sunday, and Patricia Santangelo was in church with her kids when she says the music recording industry peeked into her computer and decided to take her to court.

Santangelo says she has never downloaded a single song on her computer, but the industry didn't see it that way. The woman from Wappingers Falls is among the more than 16,000 people who have been sued for allegedly pirating music through file-sharing computer networks.

"I assumed that when I explained to them who I was and that I wasn't a computer downloader, it would just go away," she said in an interview. "I didn't really understand what it all meant. But they just kept insisting on a financial settlement."

The industry is demanding thousands of dollars to settle the case, but Santangelo, unlike the 3,700 defendants who have already settled, says she will stand on principle and fight the lawsuit.

"It's a moral issue," she said. "I can't sign something that says I agree to stop doing something I never did."

If the downloading was done on her computer, Santangelo thinks it may have been the work of a young friend of her children. Santangelo, 43, has been described by a federal judge as "an Internet-illiterate parent, who does not know Kazaa from kazoo, and who can barely retrieve her e-mail."

The drain on her resources to fight the case — she's divorced, has five children aged 7 to 19 and works as a property manager for a real estate company — forced her this month to drop her lawyer and begin representing herself.

"There was just no way I could continue on with a lawyer," she said. "I'm out $24,000 and we haven't even gone to trial."

So on Thursday she sat alone at the defense table before U.S. Magistrate Judge Mark Fox in White Plains, looking a little nervous and replying simply, "Yes, sir" and "No, sir" to his questions about scheduling and evidence exchange.

She did not look like someone who would have downloaded songs like Incubus' "Nowhere Fast," Godsmack's "Whatever" and Third Eye Blind's "Semi-Charmed Life," all of which were allegedly found on her computer.

Her former lawyer, Ray Beckerman, said Santangelo doesn't really need him.

"I'm sure she's going to win," he said. "I don't see how they could win. They have no case. They have no evidence she ever did anything. They don't know how the files appeared on her computer or who put them there."

Jenni Engebretsen, a spokeswoman for the Recording Industry Association of America, the coalition of music companies that is pressing the lawsuits, would not comment specifically on Santangelo's case.

"Our goal with all these anti-piracy efforts is to protect the ability of the recording industry to invest in new bands and new music and give legal online services a chance to flourish," she said. "The illegal downloading of music is just as wrong as shoplifting from a local record store."

The David-and-Goliath nature of the case has attracted considerable attention in the Internet community. To those who defend the right to such "peer-to-peer" networks and criticize the RIAA's tactics, Santangelo is a hero.

Jon Newton, founder of an Internet site critical of the record companies, said by e-mail that with all the settlements, "The impression created is all these people have been successfully prosecuted for some as-yet undefined 'crime'. And yet not one of them has so far appeared in a court or before a judge. ... She's doing it alone. She's a courageous woman to be taking on the multibillion-dollar music industry."

Santangelo said her biggest issue is with Kazaa for allowing children to download music without parental permission. "I should have gotten at least an e-mail or something notifying me," she said. Telephone and e-mail messages seeking comment from the Australia-based owner of Kazaa, Sharman Networks Ltd., were not returned.

Because some cases are settled just before a trial and because it would be months before Santangelo's got that far, it's impossible to predict whether she might be the first to go to trial over music downloading.

But she vows that she's in the fight to stay.

Click the 'PayPal' button to contribute to her legal defense fund or you can write to her at:

Patti Santangelo
C/O PO Box 274
Hartsdale
New York 10530-0274

  • Legal Defense Fund Site
  • Legal Defense Fund Tracking

  • permalink 2006-04-14  tivo legal
    edit  
    Following up on the earlier entry about the TiVO EchoStar lawsuit , the jury has decided in favor of TiVo. Let the appeals begin.

    ARS Technica's, Ken Fisher wrote TiVo has emerged victorious in their patent lawsuit against EchoStar. The jury in the Federal District Court for the Eastern District of Texas has awarded TiVo US $73 million in damages. The sum falls $16 million shy of the damages originally sought by the company, but in this instance the win may be worth more than the winnings.

    permalink 2006-04-03  tivo legal
    edit  
    In Marshall, Texas a jury is being asked to decide if EchoStar Communication's DVR infringes on TiVo patents. In particular, TiVo accuses "the parent of Dish Network, the nation's second-largest satellite TV operator, of stealing its technology for recording, pausing and fast-forwarding live television programs." Maybe TiVo will win. I hope so. They make an exceptional product and I'd hate to see it go the way of Betamax.

    Forwarding, rewinding and pausing live TV are not the coolest things TiVo does. Something no one else has apparently attempted that TiVo does quite well, is to suggest programs that the viewer might enjoy based on previous selections. The TiVo remote has 'Thumbs Up' and 'Thumbs Down' buttons so the viewer can indicate if the program is enjoyable or not. As the history of indicated viewer preferences grows, TiVo gets better and better at suggesting other programs. For example, I like Xena, Warrior Princess and TiVo has on occasion suggested programs which featured Lucy Lawless. Makes sense to me.

    TiVo has also made some progress converting my TV into a digital media server. As I a write this I am listening to a cut from Exile on Main Street by The Rolling Stones courtesy of a feed from Live365 piping through my TiVo box into my TV.

    There are a few hundred pictures of my friends and family on a computer upstairs that my TiVo box can display via a wireless network connection to the PC. It can find and play files in the 'My Music' folder, too. Linux-based TiVo is one smart box. It has converted my TV into the monitor and speakers for my computer's digital media. Everything old is new again, especially if you remember connecting a Commodore 64 to the TV.

    It is impossible for someone like me to predict TiVo's chances in their case against EchoStar and to tell the truth parts of the proceedings make the whole affair sound a little fishy to me. James M. Barton (a TiVo founder) said "he showed EchoStar officials a prototype of a TiVo box, and accidentally left it at EchoStar's Colorado offices." I suppose it depends on what the meaning of the word 'accidentally' is.

    DirecTV, currently TiVo's biggest customer, plans to switch to another DVR maker next year but TiVo signed a deal with the nation's largest cable operator, Comcast Corp. So hopefully, TiVo will be around for a good long while yet. And if they win this case down in Marshall, Texas all the better.

    permalink 2006-03-16  adsense internet legal
    edit  
    What are the economic factors that make some keywords cheap and others expensive? Supply and demand, obviously. If every one wants the top position for a given keyword then the price is bid upwards. If on the other hand, no one wants a keyword it can be had for 1¢ a click.

    Why would it be that at the time of this entry, one of the top keywords is "Mesothelioma", a lung disease associated with exposure to asbestos? Anyone searching for that term might be suffering from it or know someone who is. The most obvious advertisements are paid for by law firms [hardly surprising considering their history] hoping to represent people who have been affected or are willing to claim to be affected by the disease.

      The RAND Institute for Civil Justice has recognized that asbestos litigation is the longest running mass tort in U.S. history. Recent sharp increases have been confirmed in the rate of filing asbestos claims in the United States, as have concomitant increases in the number and types of firms named as defendants, and also an escalation in the costs of the litigation to these defendants. (Analysts have estimated that the total costs of asbestos litigation in the USA alone will eventually reach $200 billion.)

      ---Wikipedia

    The matter has become such a feeding frenzy for litigators that Senator Arlen Specter sponsored the so-called Fairness in Asbestos Injury Resolution Act of 2005 which is described as a "A bill to create a fair and efficient system to resolve claims of victims for bodily injury caused by asbestos exposure, and for other purposes." In its present form this bill would create a $140 billion fund to compensate current and future asbestos victims and be funded by companies that are at risk of liability. Further the fund would create an administrative resolution to asbestos claims, putting a stop to the lawsuits.

    The FAIR Act is also considered the best hope for veterans suffering from asbestos exposure:

      Without the FAIR Act, veterans who were exposed to toxic asbestos while serving their country and who now suffer from fatal diseases will continue to be denied compensation.

      While there may be room for improvements in the FAIR Act, it remains the most viable solution to the asbestos problem. The bill would remove asbestos claims from an overwhelmed court system and compensate sick asbestos victims from a privately financed trust fund. The FAIR Act would provide certainty to sick veterans seeking compensation for their asbestos-related illnesses.

      --- Michael Penny, Kentucky VFW

    Here are some more grim facts about what Supreme Court Justice David Souter described as the "elephantine mass" of asbestos litigation:

    • More than 700,000 people have sued companies that made or used asbestos.
    • Companies have paid some $70 billion in settlements and damage awards
    • More than 70 businesses have entered into bankruptcy.
    • Hundreds of thousands of cases remain stacked up on court dockets.

    On thousands of junk web pages it has become fodder for unscrupulous webmasters who publish sentence fragments and jumbled copies of text lifted from a few legitimate websites in the hope of making a quick buck. If we are lucky the fervor will eventually die down as the Federal government continues its efforts to minimize the economic impact on businesses of this far-reaching litigious issue.

    If you are someone who needs help and information about mesothelioma here are some legitimate resources on the web:


    permalink 2004-02-17  legal
    edit  
    an excellent legal resource
    tags: larger lettering indicates there are more entries with that tag
    9-11
    adsense
    bob_hope
    book
    bush
    ching
    computers
    cool
    fire
    firefox
    flood
    freedom
    funny
    gadget
    games
    gianna
    google
    google_analytics
    harry_potter
    history
    html
    ibm
    internet
    iraq
    jack_black
    javascript
    jobs
    johnny_cash
    keeshan
    legal
    linux
    maps
    marilyn_vos_savant
    microsoft
    movie
    mukhtar_mai
    music
    open_source
    outsourcing
    pair.com
    people
    photo
    picasa
    politics
    programming
    reference
    sco
    security
    site
    spam
    spyware
    star_trek
    star_wars
    thumbly
    time
    tivo
    travel
    trivia
    unix
    usability
    wishlist
    Add to Google
     
    Web this blog
    [static pages] © 2010 Michael Thompson